solutions · build & engineering capability
Next.js + Supabase builds that hold up in production, auth, RLS, and all.
The stack is not the hard part; the schema, the RLS policies, and the billing edge cases are. I design those first, then ship the app through Claude Code agent workflows with senior review on every diff. Proven at 28,000 pages on HostList.
who this is for
SaaS founders building the first version
Teams outgrowing no-code
Directory and marketplace operators
Product teams with a half-built Supabase app
the stack
- Next.js App Router
- Supabase
- Stripe
- Vercel
- Typesense / Algolia
- Claude Code delivery
what you get
how it runs
- Scope and schema
- Build
- Hardening
- Launch and growth
proof
hire next.js →common questions
Why Next.js and Supabase together?
They cover the full application surface with the least glue code: Next.js handles rendering, routing, and the public-facing performance story, while Supabase provides Postgres, auth, storage, and row-level security on infrastructure you can inspect. One senior engineer can own the whole stack, which keeps both velocity and accountability high. I run HostList, about 28,000 pages, on exactly this pairing.
Is Supabase production-ready for a SaaS?
Yes. Under Supabase is plain Postgres, the most battle-tested open-source database there is, plus auth and storage layers used by hundreds of thousands of projects. The production risks are almost always in how it is used: missing RLS policies, service-role keys in client code, unindexed hot queries. Those are engineering discipline problems, and they are exactly what a senior-led build prevents.
Can you take over a half-built Supabase app?
Yes, and it is a common brief. The first step is an audit of the schema, RLS policies, and auth flows, which usually surfaces a shortlist of fixes worth doing before any new features. From there we either harden in place or restructure the data model while keeping your working UI. You get the audit findings in writing either way.
How do you handle Postgres row-level security?
RLS is enabled on every table from the first migration, with policies written alongside the schema and reviewed as part of the build, never bolted on before launch. Service-role access is confined to webhooks and admin surfaces. The policy set ships documented in the repository, so your next engineer can see exactly who can read and write what, and why.
What does a Next.js and Supabase build cost?
Builds run £15-90k depending on scope: a focused MVP with auth and billing sits at the lower end, a marketplace or directory with search, moderation, and programmatic SEO at the upper. Delivery through Claude Code agent workflows keeps the cost well under an equivalent agency team build. Scoping happens in a 30-minute call and you get the range before you commit to anything.
Do you migrate from Firebase or a no-code tool?
Yes. Firebase migrations map Firestore collections to a relational Postgres schema, which usually simplifies the data model considerably. No-code migrations from Bubble or Webflow keep your validated flows and rebuild them on the production stack, with redirects and SEO transport included so you keep the traffic you already earned.
the first call
Describe the product. Leave with a schema opinion and a price range.
Thirty minutes on your product, your data model, and your timeline. If Next.js + Supabase is the wrong stack for it, I will say so and tell you what fits.