Tinybird

Build your own analytics on ClickHouse. The infra layer for custom user-facing analytics.

VISIT TINYBIRD

Key takeaway: This is the pick when analytics is something you ship to your customers rather than something you read internally. Tinybird gives you hosted ClickHouse with a SQL-to-API workflow, and you build the interface. If you want a finished dashboard to look at on Monday morning, every other tool in this directory is a better answer.

Quick facts

  • CategoryOpen-source / self-host
  • PricingFreemium
  • Starts atFree / $25
  • LicenseProprietary
  • Created2020
  • GitHub starsclosed
  • Script sizeBYO
  • CookielessNo
  • Self-hostNo

What it is

Tinybird is not a finished analytics product, it is the infrastructure layer for building your own. Hosted ClickHouse with a SQL-to-API workflow. Used by teams that need to ship user-facing analytics dashboards inside their own product (e.g. analytics-as-a-feature for SaaS). Generous free tier; usage-based pricing scales sensibly.

Best for

  • SaaS companies shipping user-facing analytics as a product feature
  • Teams that have outgrown PostHog / Mixpanel and need custom data models
  • Engineers who want ClickHouse without operating ClickHouse

When not to pick it

Skip Tinybird if you want a finished dashboard product, it is BYO frontend. Skip if you do not have engineering capacity to write SQL and build dashboards.

My take

Tinybird is the right pick when analytics is a product feature, not a back-office tool. For internal analytics, PostHog wins on time-to-value. For analytics-shipped-to-customers, Tinybird is the modern answer.

ClickHouse without an on-call rotation

ClickHouse is the right database for analytical queries over very large tables and the wrong thing to operate when data infrastructure is not your team's job. Tinybird's proposition is to keep the query engine and remove the cluster: you stream events in over HTTP or from Kafka, define pipes as SQL, and each pipe publishes as a parameterised, authenticated REST endpoint your front end calls directly. There is no serving layer to write and no ingestion service to maintain, which is usually a few sprints you were about to spend. Query latency is the reason people stay, because fast aggregations over huge tables are what make an in-product analytics tab feel instant rather than apologetic. The workflow is version-controllable and fits normal CI, which matters because these pipes become production API surface, not analyst scratch work.

Everything you still have to build

Be clear about the scope. Tinybird gives you ingestion, storage, query, and an API. It does not give you a tracker script, a session model, bot filtering, a dashboard, charts, or any of the product decisions PostHog and Mixpanel have already made on your behalf. You are writing the SQL, designing the schema, choosing aggregation windows, and building the interface, and you need somebody comfortable with ClickHouse's particular way of thinking about sorting keys and materialised views. That is entirely reasonable when the output is a customer-facing feature you will charge for. It is a poor use of a team's time when the output is a chart your marketing lead checks weekly. The honest test: if nobody outside your company will ever see these numbers, buy a finished product instead.

Frequently asked questions

What is Tinybird used for?

Building analytics that ship inside your own product: usage dashboards for your customers, real-time metrics over high-volume event streams, and anything needing fast aggregation across large tables behind an API. It is infrastructure rather than a finished analytics tool, so it competes with building on ClickHouse yourself, not with Mixpanel or PostHog.

Tinybird or PostHog?

PostHog when the audience for the numbers is your own team, because it is finished and you get answers on day one. Tinybird when the audience is your customers and the dashboard is part of what you sell. Plenty of teams run both: PostHog for internal product analytics, Tinybird for the customer-facing metrics tab.

Do I need to know SQL to use Tinybird?

Yes, and specifically you need to be comfortable with ClickHouse's dialect and performance model: sorting keys, materialised views, and how aggregation states behave. The workflow is SQL in, API out, so it is not an optional layer you can skip. Without that skill on the team, a packaged product will get you further faster.

Links

Similar tools you should also consider

If Tinybird is your pick, the next conversation is short

The 30-min call is where your analytics choice becomes a real implementation, an event-tracking plan that fits your product, and a privacy story that does not need a 4-screen cookie banner.